The CDC’s recent revision on autism and vaccines revives long-settled questions and may deepen hesitancy without offering any new insight
On November 19, 2025, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) quietly revised its ‘Autism and Vaccines’ webpage. The updated version now asserts that the statement “vaccines do not cause autism” is “not an evidence-based claim because studies have not ruled out the possibility that infant vaccines cause autism.”
For parents of autistic children and for those who already feel anxious about vaccines, this is not just a minor technical clarification. It sounds like: “Maybe vaccines really do cause autism, and no one told us.”
As a psychiatrist who works with autistic youth and their families at all stages of life, I worry this language misrepresents the science and adds emotional burden to families who are already under a lot of stress.
The vaccine–autism question is not new. It has been extensively studied for over 20 years through large, well-designed research across various countries.
A few examples:
Additionally, independent reviews and summaries from the National Academy of Medicine, Immunize.org (a nonprofit organization that provides up-to-date vaccination information and advocates for policies that improve access), and academic vaccine-safety centers have consistently found that the epidemiologic evidence does not support a link between vaccines and autism.
Independent, science-based journalism delivered directly to your inbox.
Autism advocacy and scientific organizations, including the Autism Science Foundation, have publicly criticized the new CDC webpage for misrepresenting this body of work.
There has been no new, high-quality study proving that vaccines cause autism. What changed is a single federal webpage.
The updated CDC language relies on a familiar but misleading idea: Because science cannot definitively rule out a link in every child, saying “vaccines do not cause autism” is not considered “evidence-based.”
But in medicine, we rarely work with 100% certainty. Instead, we ask:
When numerous independent studies involving millions of children fail to find an increased risk, the evidence-based conclusion is not we can’t say. It’s: if any risk exists, it is so small that it has not appeared despite extensive, careful searching.
We apply that standard to medications, procedures, and everyday health choices. Using a stricter, unfair standard only for vaccines — specifically regarding autism — doesn’t truly protect families. It only causes confusion.
For my patients and their parents, this change is not just theoretical.
Lost in this noise is what autistic children and adults truly need: early identification, personalized support, and communities that see them as whole people, not as “vaccine injuries.”
When families ask me about the CDC update, I usually focus on three points:
Parents deserve honest science, clear language and practical support when making difficult decisions for their children. The CDC’s revised wording may be framed as ‘caution,’ but for the families I see, it’s creating confusion and emotional strain without offering any new clarity.
DISCLAIMER: MedShadow provides information and resources related to medications, their effects, and potential side effects. However, it is important to note that we are not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. The content on our site is intended for educational and informational purposes only. Individuals dealing with medical conditions or symptoms should seek guidance from a licensed healthcare professional, such as a physician or pharmacist, who can provide personalized medical advice tailored to their specific circumstances.
While we strive to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information presented on MedShadow, we cannot guarantee its completeness or suitability for any particular individual’s medical needs. Therefore, we strongly encourage users to consult with qualified healthcare professionals regarding any health-related concerns or decisions. By accessing and using MedShadow, you acknowledge and agree that the information provided on the site is not a substitute for professional medical advice and that you should always consult with a qualified healthcare provider for any medical concerns.
Help fund our fight for improved medication safety and transparency by supporting our independent journalism.
Give NowIndependent, science-based journalism delivered directly to your inbox.
We seek to create a world where there are safer medications for all and where all people are fully informed about their medication benefits and side effects, using our explanatory and investigative journalism to both inform and stimulate public discussion to drive toward solutions.
Want to hear expert insights about medication safety and other care options? Watch all our past webinars and sign up for upcoming ones.
WATCH NowNo comments yet. Be the first to comment!