Unnecessary Risk for What Benefit?

I’ve just learned about a drug called dexamethasone (dex). It’s a male steroid that the FDA has approved for several uses — but not for use prenatally. In fact, given the disastrous history of DES, a female hormone that crossed the placental barrier causing a raft of issues for the fetus and the fetus’s offspring and grandchildren, I would think that sex hormone or steroids would be off the table as a treatment for pregnant women. I was wrong.

cDex has been used since the early 1980s on women who are pregnant and at risk for having a second child with CAH – congenital adrenal hyperplasia. 1 in 15,000 children are born with this disease. Many are tested at birth in a simple heel prick blood test. Please see our page on CAH for more information.

This full effects of dex on a fetus are unknown. There is no research to show the benefits of treatment with dex outweigh the risks.

Fetal exposure to dex doesn’t cure CAH, it doesn’t change the course of treatment for the child born with it. The only thing it does is minimize the cosmetic “masculinization” of female genitals which is an effect of CAH. The females born with CAH might have ambiguous genitals, which are variable and different in each female child. For example the clitoris might be enlarged and/or slightly penis-shaped. The labia might be connected like scrotum. This is upsetting for the parents and is usually corrected with cosmetic surgery while the child is still an infant. It is also claimed that using dex will “correct” for tomboyism and lesbianism thought to possibly accompany CAH in females. Apparently these doctors want to discourage tomboys and stop lesbianism through unproven, experimental chemistry.

Given that the long-term risks of exposing a fetus to dex are undiscovered as yet, parents need to be fully informed about the risks and the options for the different outcomes.

Fortunately the use of dex in these cases is very limited, a few hundred fetuses since the early 80s. But that’s bad too — there are so few it would be difficult to track an adverse event (and it’s been less than 30 years) but it’s been used long enough for a false sense of complacency, “Doctors have been doing this for thirty years, how could it be a bad thing?”

Sex hormones and sex steroids have been proven to affect the fetus, but there hasn’t been any testing for long-term effects. It took 30 years to discover the massive damages that DES caused, why are doctors suggesting that mothers take this risk for so small a benefit?

Did you find this article helpful?

Latest News

Synthetic Red Blood Cells, NOAC’s for Atrial Fibrillation, Surgery to Ease Sciatica Pain

Synthetic Red Blood Cells, NOAC’s for Atrial Fibrillation, Surgery to Ease Sciatica Pain

Researchers have managed to create artificial red blood cells that can transport medication. Compared to the popular anticoagulant Warfarin, NOAC’s may be superior for treating atrial fibrillation patients with prior intracranial hemorrhage. Also, surgery may be the preferred choice for reducing leg pain in patients with sciatica.  Synthetic Red Blood…

FDA Recalls Metformin and NP Thyroid

FDA Recalls Metformin and NP Thyroid

The FDA has issued a recall of two drugs–NP Thyroid and Metformin–after testing revealed that they weren’t up to code. Read more below, and if you’re taking either medication, please be sure to contact your doctor for how to continue treatment responsibly.  NP Thyroid Recalled Thirteen lots of NP Thyroid,…

  • Advertisement