12 Times Simone Gold and the Frontline Doctors Misled You About the COVID-19 Vaccine

getting the covid-19 vaccine

Like you, I’ve heard a lot about the Frontline Doctors organization that materialized, seemingly, out of nowhere to stand on the Supreme Court steps in July and declare that much of the COVID-19 information that the CDC (Centers for Disease Prevention and Treatment), the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) and individual state authorities were giving out was a lie.

While garnering headlines, the Frontline Doctors produced its breakout star, emergency room physician and attorney Simone Gold, MD. Because a good friend asked my opinion of Gold’s recent video, I spent an hour watching her YouTube lecture. Although the video has been taken down from YouTube for “violating our terms of service,” I was easily able to find the re-post by searching “Simone Gold.” The same video, now titled, “Video 1,” is the fourth video down from the top. If the link in this paragraph doesn’t yield you the right YouTube video, keep looking.

During the video, Gold spent the first part delving into why COVID-19 should be named “Wuhan” or some other name linking the virus to China. That’s a political debate, not a medical one. I fast-forwarded from there and listened to her 10 minutes on hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and 40 minutes deriding the science behind the mRNA vaccines — the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines now being given to Americans. 

An engaging speaker, Gold argued in support of HCQ and against the COVID-19 vaccines. Her arguments sounded “good,” except that she and the Frontline Doctors leave out a lot of critical information. Everything Gold said was technically “true,” but it was woefully incomplete. Really, she was telling lies of omission by cherry-picking information, using old data when newer, better data is available, and raising questions to cast doubt, when those questions have already been answered sufficiently. 

Our health and lives deserve the complete story, so I’ve gone through the points Gold makes in the video to show how she has woven true and false information to mislead viewers. Below, I’ve lined up 12 of her arguments against the facts. 

1. The Safety of HCQ

Minute 5:11

The first clue that Gold was choosing to offer only one set of information was her focus on hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). There are a LOT of other low-cost well-known drugs and therapies that are much safer than HCQ and demonstrably lower the death rate for COVID-19. Why is Gold only suggesting HCQ as a cure? 

Gold claims that HCQ is “common, ordinary, safe.” It is not. Among the adverse events (AE) that HCQ can cause are fatal heart problems, suicidal behavior, severe psoriasis outbreaks and chloroquine-resistant malaria. 

HCQ should only be administered in a hospital setting, so that trained personnel can address any heart problems. Taking it can slow the heartbeat, a condition called elongated QT that can lead to heart failure in up to 30% of patients. 

Gold explained that she, herself, took HCQ 20 years ago on a trip to a malaria-infected country. About taking HCQ she said, “It was a big, fat nothing burger.” Gold claims that HCQ is given freely to US troops and travelers, which is out of date. HCQ is now only used in acute cases for one type of malaria, and, in general, is no longer used to prevent or treat malaria. 

For prevention of malaria, UpToDate.com suggests that there are very few destinations in the world where the malaria parasite is still sensitive to chloroquine. In other regions, travelers will likely need drugs like atovaquone-proguanil or tafenoquine. Mefloquine and doxycycline. UpToDate.com is a prescribing resource used by doctors in clinical settings, such as hospitals and medical offices, for evidence-based summaries on drugs.

To “prove” the drug is safe, Gold notes that those with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and similar diseases have, when needed, taken it for long periods. That’s true. However, HCQ is not the first choice of drug for RA due to its side effects. Safer drugs like methotrexate or similar DMARD (disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs) are recommended first. When first-line drugs are ineffective for RA patients, the risk of HCQ’s side effects in those cases outweighs the benefits. 

2. Yes, a study on HCQ was withdrawn

To justify that HCQ is safe, Gold recounted the findings of a study in The Lancet, the prestigious British medical journal, which was later withdrawn. The study revealed that it is dangerous to treat COVID-19 with hydroxychloroquine. Just because the study was retracted doesn’t necessarily mean its findings are incorrect; it means that the data to support that conclusion were flawed. 

“It needs to be emphasized that despite this article’s retraction, there is still no good evidence that hydroxychloroquine is effective for COVID-19,” noted Ian Musgrave, PhD, a senior lecturer in pharmacology at the University of Adelaide in Australia. 

When the FDA announced it was revoking the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), it referenced the UK’s RECOVERY trial, which is still testing several different treatments. The study found that in its hydroxychloroquine test group, which enrolled 4,674 hospitalized patients, there was no difference in mortality between those on hydroxychloroquine and those on standard care, nor was there any benefit in the hydroxychloroquine group for a shorter hospital stay or other outcomes, such as reduced ventilator use. 

MedShadow has published several articles on the dangers of using HCQ to treat COVID-19.

Further, the majority of studies show that HCQ does not work in curing or preventing COVID-19. Because there are always outlying studies, science conducts multiple ones. Looking at the totality, it is reasonable to conclude that HCQ is probably not the cure. 

3. Why don’t we have vaccinations for other coronaviruses?

Minute 24:20

Gold says that researchers “failed” in creating vaccines for previous coronaviruses like SARS and MERS. “They can’t do it safely,” she says, and adds that AIDS doesn’t have a vaccine either (Minute 25:01). That’s largely false. In every case, except AIDS, vaccines were deemed unnecessary because the disease can be controlled. 

For both SARS (COV-1) and MERS (MERS-CoV), it’s possible to isolate patients and prevent larger outbreaks because they are not contagious until symptoms appear. Vaccination research was abandoned on these two diseases because vaccines are not needed and no one would pay for the development. 

Unfortunately, COVID-19 patients are contagious long before becoming symptomatic. Even more difficult, some people get infected with COVID-19 and have such mild symptoms (or even no symptoms) and spread COVID-19 without knowing it. Therefore, isolating the sick is too little,  too late.  

As for AIDS, scientists have been working on a vaccine for the disease for decades, but AIDS has very little in common with SARS CoV-1, MERS or SARS-CoV-2. 

4. Were there animal studies? 

Minute 25:28

Gold claims that the COVID-19 vaccines were never tested in animals. which, if true, would be concerning. Fortunately for us, her claim is false. A simple Google search of “are there any animal studies for COVID-19 vaccine?” found published animal studies in Nature.comCell Journal and at the NIH and was reported in FierceBiotech.com.

5. Gold claims that mRNA is brand-new technology. It is not

Minute 23:52

I, too, was very skeptical of  the vaccine until I learned about the role of mRNA in the body, Recently, I read the long history of research into creating mRNA vaccines (much of the work done in response to MERS and SARS, but ultimately it was not needed). Then I found out about the role of mRNA in the body that the vaccine uses, in part by listening to an enlightening podcast by Sanja Gupta, an amazing medical communicator, writer and neurosurgeon. 

mRNA has been studied for several decades, and efforts to use it as a vaccine have been the holy grail for some time. A regular vaccine generally releases a very weak or dead virus, or pieces of it, to trigger the immune system so that it can gear up quickly when it reappears in nature. Isolating and inactivating a virus is a slow process, like 10-plus-years slow. 

Just like that but completely different: mRNA, which can be made quickly, carries a message to our cells to create the specific “spike” proteins found on the COVID-19 virus (not the entire virus), so that the immune system will kick in and then recognize it when exposed again in nature. 

6. ADE (antibody-dependent enhancement) 

Minutes 25:50 and 33:54

Gold defined antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) as a process where, instead of giving protection from COVID-19, an ADE response to the vaccine can “cause an overreaction in a negative way if exposed to the virus.” She claims that during the development of the SARS COV-1 vaccine, ferrets received two vaccine doses (as is the protocol for COVID-19) and they were fine. “Later,” she adds, “they were exposed to SARS Cov-1 in the wild, and they died. That’s why the SARS COV-1 vaccine never came to market.” Patently untrue. See: Why do we not have vaccinations for other coronavirus vaccinations? (above)

ADE is a well-known medical  issue (as Gold said), and one that vaccine manufacturers have taken steps to prevent. Below is a paragraph from a Science article that explains the protections that both Moderna and Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines have put in place. Essentially, it explains that because the ADE phenomenon is much more likely to occur after the protein binds to cells, it makes sure human bodies would build the protein in such a way that it would not bind to their cells.

“This has been why we’ve seen so many vaccines taking care to put the ‘spike’ protein into its ‘prefusion’ conformation.’ The worry has been that if antibodies are generated after it’s had a chance to bind to human cells, that gives you a better chance for non-neutralizing ones (and thus potentially a better chance for ADE). And you’ll have noticed the emphasis on neutralizing antibody titers along the way as well – that would have been there anyway, but a high proportion of outright neutralizing antibodies is also a safeguard against antibody-driven enhancement of disease.” 

7. Does the vaccine cause fertility problems for women?  

Minute 27:50

Pregnant women were not included in the study group, so we have no idea how the vaccine affects them or the developing fetus, or whether the disease affects the fetus. Further, no one is creating a cohort of babies born in the pandemic or vaccinated world, so we won’t know if there are any unanticipated adverse events for the fetuses years later. 

Gold talks about the syncytiotrophoblast cell in the placenta, claiming that active infection with COVID-19 interferes with the formation of this part of the placenta. Syncytiotrophoblast is the outer covering of the placental wall, into which the fertilized egg embeds for nutrition. 

Gold concludes by floating the idea that it’s possible the vaccine could trick the placenta into thinking it’s got COVID, which always leads to infertility. “You don’t know what you don’t know,” she says. As doctors, the Frontline Doctors, should know the placenta is an organ that the uterus grows when a woman is pregnant. When there’s no pregnancy, there is no placenta to trick.

Her theory that the COVID-19 vaccination will render women infertile has been debunked in several places. Here’s a link to an interesting podcast that was even understandable to a non-science major like me on The ZDoggMD Show (yes, it’s a terrible name, but he’s really good).

Gold states the Frontline Doctors “feels very strongly that (women under age 50) can not even be offered this” vaccine. Boston Children’s Hospital published an article about pregnancy and COVID-19. The article notes:

“Evidence has shown that pregnancy is a risk factor for severe illness in women with COVID-19. A recent CDC study reviewed case reports of approximately 400,000 women aged 15 to 44 with symptomatic COVID-19. Those who were pregnant had a roughly tripled likelihood of ICU admission and invasive ventilation and 70%higher mortality.

“Yet, their newborns are mostly doing well. Reports indicate that babies born to COVID-19-infected mothers are infected only about 5% of the time. Moreover, most of those who test positive have mild or asymptomatic infections, rarely needing mechanical ventilation.”

8. Can you sue if you’re harmed by the vaccine?

Minute 30:27 

It is true that “pharmaceutical companies have liability immunity for COVID-19 vaccinations,” however, Gold failed to point out that this is true for all standard vaccinations in the US. We are already seeing reports of severe allergic reactions and AEs, which can happen with all vaccinations. Because of the risk of unlimited liability that can happen in US courts, in the 1980s, manufacturers stopped making such vaccines against polio, rabies and tetanus. They make so little profit on them, the thinking is why should the pharmaceutical companies take on the risk of being sued? 

To get companies to continue making them, the US created the Vaccine Injury Compensation Panel. If you have an AE, file your complaint with the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). 

The Atlantic published an excellent article on the US VICP before COVID-19 became an issue. 

9. Gold: “The COVID-19 vaccination doesn’t stop the transmission of COVID-19.”

Minute 31:30

The data absolutely showed a much lower incidence of getting symptomatic COVID-19 after having had the vaccine. A HUGE flaw in the studies on both the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines was that participants were only tested if they showed symptoms, so we can’t definitively say if the vaccine prevents people from transmitting the disease or only suppresses the symptoms. 

But the data from both trials show that the vaccinated get COVID-19 at a much lower rate and have many fewer severe cases. The vaccine does give you protection from the illness. 

10. Black population targeted as high priority for vaccination 

Gold claims to be offended that vaccinating Blacks is a high priority. She says that “we know” who gets and dies from COVID — the elderly, nursing home residents and those with 2.6 or more of the known comorbidities. She positions the government directive to give priority to Blacks as racist, but Gold neglects to report that Blacks as a group die 2.8 times more frequently than whites (hospitalized 4 times more), Hispanics 2.6 times and American Indians 2.4 times. 

11. V-safe tracking system 

Gold is against the V-safe tracking system, but not for the reason I thought. My guess was that she would have objected to the government tracking citizens. Instead, it’s that being tracked for your response to the vaccine means you’re in a clinical trial. DUH!! Isn’t that what she had been saying for the entire hour in the video? 

We don’t know all we want and need to know about side effects or efficacy of these two vaccines, so if you get either vaccine, FOR GOD’S SAKE, SIGN UP FOR THE TRACKING. This is how the NIH/FDA knows if there are adverse events. This is how you can be alerted if there is breakthrough info on the vaccination you got. 

BTW, she says the tracking is for two years for the public at large. That’s not right; it’s for six months. Those actually in the official trial get tracked for two years by drugmakers Pfizer or Moderna. She also says you “get signed up” automatically, but that’s false, too. . You have to choose to sign up for it. My own internist got the shot and didn’t sign up. 

12. Not in the video, but notable 

Simone Gold was also one of the people who stormed the Capital. A graduate of Stanford University Law School, she has been quoted as saying she didn’t know it was illegal. That stretches my ability to believe her or to be sympathetic. She had to know it was breaking the law, and she needs to own it. 

The US Department of Justice charged Gold with entering a restricted building or grounds, violent entry and disorderly conduct.

So Gold is not your basic doctor who interrupted her career because she is shocked by irregularities in the healthcare system. Disruption is what she does; it is her career. She is deeply embedded in groups that create a miasma of fear and distrust of our national systems. 

The COVID-19 vaccinations were definitely rushed to market. There are many more questions we deserve the answers to before inoculation. But in a risk-benefit analysis, the US government made the determination to accept the risk in exchange for the overwhelming benefits amid an ongoing pandemic. You make your own decision. 


Suzanne B. Robotti

Suzanne Robotti founded MedShadow Foundation in 2012. Learn more about Su and her mission.


Did you find this article helpful?


Subscribe
Notify of
guest
122 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Gloria Vaderbilt
Gloria Vaderbilt
7 days ago

Robotti is a traiter to humanity.

C. Spheres
C. Spheres
15 days ago

After reading this smear-piece, I am suspicious that ‘Suzanne B. Robotti’ is a supposedly amusing ‘made up’ name for an AI-algorithm based ‘auto-text-writing bot’ developed by Big Pharmaceutical corps with too much to gain and even more to hide!

Vickie Casey
Vickie Casey
18 days ago

This is a gross example, how when the truth comes out, they do everything they can to suppress it. This article is trying to counter the truth and make people not trust AFLDS. That is how bad things have gotten. Our health means nothing to these people. Hospitals are forced to give no treatment and doctors are going along with it. The oath they gave to always preserve life and do no harm means nothing. I don’t even want to go to a hospital it makes me sick that these hospitals don’t care, all they care about is getting paid.… Read more »

Joe
Joe
27 days ago

This article has a lot of its own flaws!

El Gallo
El Gallo
28 days ago

Astonishingly biased. and misinformed. The comment about the Lancet debacle alone is ridiculous. Lancet crashed and burned trying to manufacture evidence and its considerable prestige was badly tarnished because of it.

USA
USA
28 days ago

This author is clueless. Do us all a favor and burn all other works you already have written or are in the process of writing. Your statements and conclusions are dangerous. I recommend putting your resume out in a field outside of medicine or health because you are clueless. Good riddance…and be sure to get that booster! Survival of the fittest (best wishes to you with the COVID jab roulette game!).

Presouz
Presouz
29 days ago

Well I’m waiting for the Frontline doctors to call me as I wait here to get my ivermectin. I have an overrun of demadex which is only cured by two doses of ivermectin! Do you think my Kaiser doctor would write that prescription as hands are tied he said from the top he said what a load of crap FDA medicine for an FDA use and he can’t even write me a prescription! Why am I paying hundreds of dollars a month to have insurance if I have to go to private practice.? And yes this is a hit job… Read more »

Oh hi
Oh hi
1 month ago

This article isn’t aging well.

Mac Odiessa
Mac Odiessa
1 month ago

If there was ever misinformation, it would be this hit piece article. Hydroxychloroquine is available over the counter in all of Central and South America and most of the African and Asian continents. It has been used to treat auto-immune diseases and Malaria for about 65 years by people of all ages and is extremely safe. This covid covert op is just the first step to move this country and all the others to a one world government. If you don’t have a Bible, get one and read it. Christ is the only lasting hope mankind has.

Flaptop
Flaptop
1 month ago

Just look at the VAERS government safety reports. ABout 5,000 people have died shortly after having the vaccine. I directly know a doctor who gave these mRNAvaccines at a community clinic and a 70 year old man died of bloot clots within in one week. Don’t sugar coat it. These vaccines are in EXPERIMENTAL stage and have not been fully approved. I also am aware of people who developed heart inflammation.

Last edited 1 month ago by Flaptop
Flaptop
Flaptop
1 month ago

“The US Department of Justice charged Gold with entering a restricted building or grounds, violent entry and disorderly conduct.”
It is a lie that she entered with “violent entry”. She was peaceful. This article was designed to denigrate a courageous woman.

Janey Macdonald
Janey Macdonald
1 month ago

Ms Robotti is the consumer representative on the FDA’s Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee.

Lucky
Lucky
2 months ago

What a bunch of crap – who paid you to write this garbage? Fauci, Moderna, who? This is misinformation. I wonder what happens to those who contribute to crimes against humanity? I think history was unfavorable to people to did that. And who has ever heard of MedShadow?!?! Sounds very dark, demonish to me… If you’d like, I’ll give you my extra shots, I’ll make popcorn for your ADE reaction, possibly as early as this winter.

Terri
Terri
2 months ago

Wow, this article is full of misinformation. Your comments about the safety of HCQ are completely false. In 2014, I was diagnosed with an autoimmune disease. My rheumatologist gave me different drug options to control my disease. The safest drug, per my rheumatologist, was HCQ, the ONLY side effect I was told to look for was eye damage. HCQ is not administered in a hospital setting, so that trained personnel can “address any heart problems”. It is a prescribed drug. I took HCQ for 4 years, 400 mg a day and never had any heart problems, suicidal behavior, or severe… Read more »

Lesley
Lesley
2 months ago

People are waking up to your fear mongering and lies the “vaccine” is poison

Jfghj
Jfghj
2 months ago

Liar. Yr the person peddling lies, ppl are waking up to yr hoax. We know everything behind it, yr on their salary payroll. Piss off with yr crap

RENE BRETON
RENE BRETON
2 months ago

all bullshit. people are dying and very sick. tel the truth

SL Simmons
SL Simmons
2 months ago

All this a side, I must say I have a list of family and friends affected very negatively by this vaccine to include a couple deaths. If I compare it to family and friends who got Covid and were sick for a little while and moved. I will take my chances. In addition, the odds of dying or having long term issues from the vaccine are much greater.

John Doe
John Doe
2 months ago

You are full of biased information. Ivermectin has been proven to be safe and effective. And I myself know 10 coworkers with severe vaccine adverse reactions, including 1 death, 1 stroke, 1 kidney failure, 1 chronic rash, 1 swollen legs, and 5 chronic joint pain sufferers. This is among my 600 coworkers, whom not one of them died of Covid. The vaccine is more dangerous than covid unless you are over 80 years old.

El Chingon
El Chingon
2 months ago

You are lying to the public. Frontline Doctors are the only ones I trust these days. If you don’t want to have the cure/prevention, then don’t use it. Go get the vaccine and enjoy the last 2-3 years of your life. Me, I will continue to take HCQ. I will continue to be healthy and I will continue to take advantage of all the benefits of HCQ. As for January 6th, the only group to storm the Capitol, was ANTIFA/BLM. Not much of a storm since police officers motioned them in and showed them were to go, and then made… Read more »

Cardiologist for Kids
Cardiologist for Kids
3 months ago

Disgrace – either ill-informed or maliciously endangering the population with this unsupported slander against a group of medical professionals who are urging caution over panic propaganda. Why don’t you step up now and take moral and financial responsibility for the families that have lost loved ones or have been negatively physically or medically impacted from the jab due to lack of research available to the public. You should be ashamed; not only having posted your erroneous opinion, but that you have not redacted or corrected your false attacks.

Melcavic
Melcavic
3 months ago

muh get paid to slander people and defame lost soul

Jose Gutierrez
Jose Gutierrez
3 months ago

Thank you dr. Now for sure I will not get injected.

Noki
Noki
3 months ago

Jesus Christ what a hit job. How about listening to the Doctor who INVENTED mRNA for vaccine delivery and his take of TREATMENT for covid.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_NNTVJzqtY

Koki
Koki
3 months ago

The claim:
“9. Gold: “The COVID-19 vaccination doesn’t stop the transmission of COVID-19.”

The attempted rebuttal:
“The data absolutely showed a much lower incidence of getting symptomatic COVID-19 after having had the vaccine.”

Doesn’t address the claim.

“we can’t definitively say if the vaccine prevents people from transmitting the disease ”

Admits neither you nor anyone can disprove the claim.

Keep trying to feed us nonsense though. 👍🏾

Latest News

Covid-19: Side Effects of Trump’s Treatments

Covid-19: Side Effects of Trump’s Treatments

President Donald Trump announced (via Twitter, of course) what some considered unthinkable, and others considered inevitable — that he had tested positive for Covid-19. Over the weekend, he received various treatments  — supplements like vitamin D, zinc and melatonin, an experimental antibody combination, an antiviral drug and a powerful anti-inflammatory…

Un-Sheltering Tips for Your Health and Immune System

Un-Sheltering Tips for Your Health and Immune System

As we all emerge from our bubbles of limited contact with others, we are walking straight into the double whammy of flu season and COVID-19 germs. Can your body fight off exposure to the flu and COVID? Your immune system feeds off the basics of life — sleep, movement, food…