MedShadow.org is dedicated to empowering people with our evidence-based journalism about the safest ways to take over-the-counter (OTC) and prescription (Rx) medications.
We also seek to stimulate public discussion about potential improvements to drug research, manufacturing and distribution processes. and also to encourage the improvement of processes to ensure that we are all better protected.
As a result, we encourage other nonprofit newsrooms, mission-aligned outlets, and advocacy organizations to republish our original content under the following conditions:
1. We Are Credited Fully and Clearly
You must include the byline and credit MedShadow.org as the original publisher. Please include a link to the original article at the top or bottom of the piece. Use the following attribution:
This article was originally published by MedShadow, a nonprofit foundation that focuses on the safest ways to take over-the-counter and prescription medications.
2. Our Content Isn’t Edited Without Permission
You may make small changes for clarity, such as adjusting headlines, subheadings, or transitions, but you may not change the core meaning, tone, or intent of the article. For substantive edits, email us at republish@medshadow.org for review and approval.
3. You Do Not Sell Or Use Our Content Commercially
Our work is free to share, but it may not be sold, monetized, or repurposed for commercial gain. You may not republish our articles behind a paywall or in publications whose primary purpose is advertising or product promotion. You may not place drug or supplement advertising adjacent to our story.
4. Photos, Graphics, and Multimedia Are Not Used Without Permission
Only the text of the article is available for republication. Images, graphics, and videos may not be reused without explicit written permission, unless they are clearly marked as Creative Commons licensed. Contact us if you’d like to request reuse of a visual asset.
If you’re unsure whether your intended use falls within these guidelines, or would like to discuss a formal syndication or licensing arrangement, please email: republish@medshadow.org
We want our journalism to reach as many people as possible, especially those making critical decisions about medications and health.
<!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Robert Kennedy, Jr., the U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary, has encouraged parents to “<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/29/us/politics/kennedy-vaccines-research.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share">do your own research</a>” before vaccinating their children. In a live interview, he stated that there should be “shared decision making” between doctors and patients. When asked about vaccination safety, Kennedy said, “I would say that we live in a democracy, and part of the responsibility of being a parent is to do your own research. You research the baby stroller, you research the foods that they’re getting, and you need to research the medicines that they’re taking as well.” </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The phrase “do your own research” has been used for years in various high-stakes, highly emotional medical controversies, from polio to measles, from COVID “cures” to vaccination policy. While the phrase sounds sensible and even benign, the reality is that it is often used to inject skepticism about scientific institutions, favoring instead personal experiences and sometimes outlandish assertions because <em>“Hey, they</em> <em>might</em> <em>be true</em>.”</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>As the founder of MedShadow, I fully support the spirit of “doing your own research,” but I am deeply concerned that this phrase has been hijacked, distorted, and even poisoned. I’m here to say I want this phrase back! “Doing your own research” can indeed be illuminating and empowering, but only if that research is done right. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>At MedShadow, we show people how to do their own research effectively. We start with our reporting, which unpacks the details and context behind the science — who funded certain studies, the scientists’ credentials, clinical trial sizes, and how long a drug has been on the market. Our investigative reporters and editors examine the facts, nuance, and context. We do 360-degree reporting with a wide variety of researchers and doctors, and we challenge ourselves to listen with open minds and check our own biases. In our articles, we also coach people on the practical realities of our current healthcare system and how it affects their health, such as tracking side effects they may experience and preparing to ask their doctors specific, productive questions. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>We do all this because we sincerely aim to give our readers as much information as possible. We know our readers crave both verification of facts and information about complementary healing options. We want to help them make educated decisions about their own health and the benefits and risks of any treatments. What's more, we don’t accept money or advertising from pharmaceutical or supplement companies, so our content is free from influence and can genuinely hold these industries accountable. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Everyone has the right and responsibility to make health decisions for themselves and their loved ones, but doing your own research shouldn't mean cherry-picking the information that lines up with your biases. Doing it effectively means that the results you gather and examine are comprehensive, thoughtfully vetted, and understood in full context. It’s a rigorous process, and it’s what the MedShadow team is devoted to doing on your behalf. </p> <!-- /wp:paragraph -->
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!