
In May, President Trump issued an executive order directing the FDA to conduct more surprise inspections of overseas drug manufacturing labs — a practice already underway but long hampered by logistical and diplomatic challenges

On May 5, 2025, President Trump issued an executive order aimed at increasing domestic medication production. In addition to removing regulatory barriers for domestic manufacturers, the order included an intention to conduct more unannounced inspections of overseas laboratories to match the level of scrutiny the country currently gives to domestic laboratories.
Despite this new directive, “our dependency on foreign sources for pharmaceuticals is not expected to go down anytime soon,” says Mariana Socal, M.D., Ph.D., an associate professor of health policy and management at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
According to a research article published in 2023, 86% of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) in U.S. medications were produced abroad, and conducting more surprise overseas laboratory inspections could help strengthen drug safety and quality. But it’s an effort the FDA has already been pursuing for years, with limited success.
Patrick Stone, a former inspector for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) who now advises manufacturers on inspection readiness, agrees the new proposal, while sound in principle, may come too late to make a meaningful difference. “This will help, but how many of them will they conduct?” he wrote in an email to MedShadow. “They conduct so few international inspections, it will take years to catch up.”
The FDA trains and employs inspectors who visit manufacturing labs in the U.S. and overseas, and determines which labs to visit based on an internal risk assessment.
Before visiting a lab, Stone explains, an inspector will familiarize himself with any complaints or issues reported to the FDA about the lab or its products and the outcomes of any previous inspections. Then, he’ll take time to learn about the products made at that facility: “How complicated is it to make? How dangerous is it at each step? If you miss a step or don’t do a step right, is it going to hurt someone?”
For most inspections, an FDA investigator will spend two to five days at a facility. He’ll look around for obvious problems that could cause contamination, such as unsealed doors, bugs, and unsterile equipment. He’ll review the company’s protocols for ensuring drug quality and investigate whether employees are adequately trained on that protocol. At the end, he’ll compile a report for the FDA, and it’s up to the agency to decide how to proceed.
Independent reporting on drug recalls, medication safety and integrative health, including supplements. No pharma funding.
For minor issues, the FDA may request voluntary corrective actions from the manufacturer. But for more serious problems, the agency can issue a Warning Letter, requiring the manufacturer to devise a plan to address deficiencies or risk an import ban.
While drug manufacturing began shifting overseas in the 1970s, the pace of expansion accelerated in the early 2000s as more laboratories opened in foreign countries. This escalation caused the FDA to fall behind with scheduled inspections.
Making things even more difficult, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) has highlighted the agency’s inability to hire and retain inspectors — many of whom are poached by industry for higher wages and better work-life balance — in report after report starting in 2009.
Even when FDA inspectors are available to travel abroad, conducting an ideal inspection presents significant challenges. In the U.S., an inspector shows up for a surprise visit at the laboratory and immediately begins a tour of the lab in its current state, explains Stone. That’s not always the case for inspections of foreign labs.
“There’s multiple challenges in creating a proper environment for an unannounced inspection,” agrees Dr. Socal.
In many countries, aninspector needs a visa or a translator to travel to the foreign lab they hope to inspect. They have to make travel and hospitality arrangements in advance. Dr. Socal explains that when an inspector makes these plans, it’s possible that the details are shared with labs, allowing them to prepare for and expect an inspection. “This could possibly undermine the real surprise factor of such inspections,” she says, adding that it’s hard to quantify how often this might happen.
President Trump’s executive order directs FDA Commissioner Dr. Martin A. Makary to devise a plan to improve the inspections of overseas drug manufacturing labs. It notes the improvements “shall be funded by increased fees on foreign manufacturing facilities to the extent consistent with applicable law.”
The executive order also directs Dr. Makary to publicly disclose the number of inspections conducted each year, broken down by country and manufacturer. This information is currently available online — though it is not easy to parse through — on the FDA Inspections Data Dashboard (an free account is required to access the information).
Though the renewed focus on surprise inspections has drawn attention, it is not without precedent: At the end of 2022, Congress directed the FDA to establish a pilot program to increase unannounced inspections of foreign drug manufacturing labs.
It’s unclear whether that program made a difference.
As of 2022, the number of foreign inspections had yet to return to pre-pandemic levels, and there is no distinct way to determine how many were unannounced.
Whether this executive order leads to improved drug safety may not be immediately apparent, either, but if the FDA’s data dashboard remains up to date, the impact could become clearer once inspection figures for 2025 — both domestic and foreign — are available.
If you’ve experienced side effects or medication issues related to this topic, we want to hear from you.
Submit Your StoryDISCLAIMER: MedShadow provides information and resources related to medications, their effects, and potential side effects. However, it is important to note that we are not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. The content on our site is intended for educational and informational purposes only. Individuals dealing with medical conditions or symptoms should seek guidance from a licensed healthcare professional, such as a physician or pharmacist, who can provide personalized medical advice tailored to their specific circumstances.
While we strive to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information presented on MedShadow, we cannot guarantee its completeness or suitability for any particular individual’s medical needs. Therefore, we strongly encourage users to consult with qualified healthcare professionals regarding any health-related concerns or decisions. By accessing and using MedShadow, you acknowledge and agree that the information provided on the site is not a substitute for professional medical advice and that you should always consult with a qualified healthcare provider for any medical concerns.
Help fund our fight for improved medication safety and transparency by supporting our independent journalism.
Give NowWe seek to create a world where there are safer medications for all and where all people are fully informed about their medication benefits and side effects, using our explanatory and investigative journalism to both inform and stimulate public discussion to drive toward solutions.
Stream our library on demand, including insights on generic drugs and pain management, straight from experts.
WATCH NOWMedShadow.org is dedicated to empowering people with our evidence-based journalism about the safest ways to take over-the-counter (OTC) and prescription (Rx) medications.
We also seek to stimulate public discussion about potential improvements to drug research, manufacturing and distribution processes. and also to encourage the improvement of processes to ensure that we are all better protected.
As a result, we encourage other nonprofit newsrooms, mission-aligned outlets, and advocacy organizations to republish our original content under the following conditions:
1. We Are Credited Fully and Clearly
You must include the byline and credit MedShadow.org as the original publisher. Please include a link to the original article at the top or bottom of the piece. Use the following attribution:
This article was originally published by MedShadow, a nonprofit foundation that focuses on the safest ways to take over-the-counter and prescription medications.
2. Our Content Isn’t Edited Without Permission
You may make small changes for clarity, such as adjusting headlines, subheadings, or transitions, but you may not change the core meaning, tone, or intent of the article. For substantive edits, email us at republish@medshadow.org for review and approval.
3. You Do Not Sell Or Use Our Content Commercially
Our work is free to share, but it may not be sold, monetized, or repurposed for commercial gain. You may not republish our articles behind a paywall or in publications whose primary purpose is advertising or product promotion. You may not place drug or supplement advertising adjacent to our story.
4. Photos, Graphics, and Multimedia Are Not Used Without Permission
Only the text of the article is available for republication. Images, graphics, and videos may not be reused without explicit written permission, unless they are clearly marked as Creative Commons licensed. Contact us if you’d like to request reuse of a visual asset.
If you’re unsure whether your intended use falls within these guidelines, or would like to discuss a formal syndication or licensing arrangement, please email: republish@medshadow.org
We want our journalism to reach as many people as possible, especially those making critical decisions about medications and health.
For website editors
Copy the article body, including its formatting and links, then paste it into your publishing system. Add the byline and required credit described in these guidelines.
<!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>On May 5, 2025, President Trump <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/05/regulatory-relief-to-promote-domestic-production-of-critical-medicines/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">issued an executive order</a> aimed at increasing domestic medication production. In addition to removing regulatory barriers for domestic manufacturers, the order included an intention to conduct more unannounced inspections of overseas laboratories to match the level of scrutiny the country currently gives to domestic laboratories.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Despite this new directive, “our dependency on foreign sources for pharmaceuticals is not expected to go down anytime soon,” says <a href="https://publichealth.jhu.edu/faculty/3523/mariana-p-socal" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Mariana Socal</a>, M.D., Ph.D., an associate professor of health policy and management at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>According to <a href="https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/10.1377/hlthaff.2022.01120" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">a research article published in 2023</a>, 86% of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) in U.S. medications were produced abroad, and conducting more surprise overseas laboratory inspections could help strengthen drug safety and quality. But it’s an effort the FDA has already been pursuing for years, with limited success.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p><a href="https://www.tradestone-qa.com/about.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Patrick Stone</a>, a former inspector for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) who now advises manufacturers on inspection readiness, agrees the new proposal, while sound in principle, may come too late to make a meaningful difference. “This will help, but how many of them will they conduct?” he wrote in an email to MedShadow. “They conduct so few international inspections, it will take years to catch up.”</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:heading --> <h2 class="wp-block-heading">How Are Drug Manufacturing Labs Regulated by the FDA?</h2> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The FDA trains and employs <a href="https://medshadow.org/the-fda-has-failed-to-inspect-thousands-of-drug-manufacturing-labs/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">inspectors who visit manufacturing labs in the U.S. and overseas</a>, and determines which labs to visit based on an internal risk assessment.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Before visiting a lab, Stone explains, an inspector will familiarize himself with any complaints or issues reported to the FDA about the lab or its products and the outcomes of any previous inspections. Then, he’ll take time to learn about the products made at that facility: “How complicated is it to make? How dangerous is it at each step? If you miss a step or don’t do a step right, is it going to hurt someone?”</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>For most inspections, an FDA investigator will spend two to five days at a facility. He’ll look around for obvious problems that could cause contamination, such as unsealed doors, bugs, and unsterile equipment. He’ll review the company’s protocols for ensuring drug quality and investigate whether employees are adequately trained on that protocol. At the end, he’ll compile a report for the FDA, and it’s up to the agency to decide how to proceed.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>For minor issues, the FDA may request voluntary corrective actions from the manufacturer. But for more serious problems, the agency can issue a Warning Letter, requiring the manufacturer to devise a plan to address deficiencies or risk an import ban.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:heading --> <h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why Aren’t There More Unannounced Inspections Overseas?</h2> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>While drug manufacturing began shifting overseas in the 1970s, the pace of expansion <a href="https://www.fda.gov/news-events/congressional-testimony/covid-19-and-beyond-oversight-fdas-foreign-drug-manufacturing-inspection-process-06022020#:~:text=This%20movement%20accelerated%20in%20the%202000s%2C%20but%20due%20to%20statutory%20mandates%20for%20biennial%20domestic%20inspections%20and%20limited%20staffing%2C%20FDA%E2%80%99s%20inspectorate%20remained%20focused%20on%20domestic%20manufacturing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">accelerated in the early 2000s</a> as more laboratories opened in foreign countries. This escalation caused the FDA to fall behind with scheduled inspections.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Making things even more difficult, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) has highlighted the agency’s inability to <a href="https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-25-106775#:~:text=What%20GAO%20Found,among%20its%20drug%20inspection%20workforce." target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">hire and retain inspectors</a> — many of whom are poached by industry for higher wages and better work-life balance — in report after report <a href="https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-24-107359" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">starting in 2009.</a></p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Even when FDA inspectors are available to travel abroad, conducting an ideal inspection presents significant challenges. In the U.S., an inspector shows up for a surprise visit at the laboratory and immediately begins a tour of the lab in its current state, explains Stone. That’s not always the case for inspections of foreign labs.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>“There’s multiple challenges in creating a proper environment for an unannounced inspection,” agrees Dr. Socal.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>In many countries, aninspector needs a visa or a translator to travel to the foreign lab they hope to inspect. They have to make travel and hospitality arrangements in advance. Dr. Socal explains that when an inspector makes these plans, it’s possible that the details are shared with labs, allowing them to prepare for and expect an inspection. “This could possibly undermine the real surprise factor of such inspections,” she says, adding that it’s hard to quantify how often this might happen.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:heading --> <h2 class="wp-block-heading">What Will the Executive Order on Surprise Inspections Do?</h2> <!-- /wp:heading --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>President Trump’s executive order directs FDA Commissioner Dr. Martin A. Makary to devise a plan to improve the inspections of overseas drug manufacturing labs. It notes the improvements “shall be funded by increased fees on foreign manufacturing facilities to the extent consistent with applicable law.”</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The executive order also directs Dr. Makary to publicly disclose the number of inspections conducted each year, broken down by country and manufacturer. This information is currently available online — though it is not easy to parse through — on the <a href="https://datadashboard.fda.gov/cder/cd/inspections.htm" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">FDA Inspections Data Dashboard</a> (an free account is required to access the information).</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Though the renewed focus on surprise inspections has drawn attention, it is not without precedent: At the end of 2022, <a href="https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2617#:~:text=(Sec.%203615)%20This%20section%20establishes%20a%20pilot%20program%20to%20increase%20unannounced%20surveillance%20inspections%20of%20foreign%20human%20drug%20establishments.%20The%20FDA%20shall%20evaluate%20the%20differences%20between%20such%20inspections%20on%20foreign%20and%20domestic%20establishments." target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Congress directed the FDA</a> to establish a pilot program to increase unannounced inspections of foreign drug manufacturing labs.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>It’s unclear whether that program made a difference.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>As of 2022, the number of foreign inspections had yet to return to pre-pandemic levels, and there is no distinct way to determine how many were unannounced.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Whether this executive order leads to improved drug safety may not be immediately apparent, either, but if the <a href="https://datadashboard.fda.gov/cder/cd/inspections.htm" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">FDA’s data dashboard</a> remains up to date, the impact could become clearer once inspection figures for 2025 — both domestic and foreign — are available.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph -->
We think it’s invaluable — and hope you agree. Our work is made possible by donations from readers like you.
We think it’s invaluable — and hope you agree. Our journalism is made possible by donations from readers like you.
As a nonprofit, we don’t take a dime from pharmaceutical or supplement companies. That means we can report on the benefits, risks, and alternatives to prescription and over-the-counter drugs free from corporate pressure or influence.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
We've noticed that you're interested in this topic. Would you read a dedicated newsletter about it?